Home

Ministers Page

Youth

People

Diary

Weekly

Disability

Circuit Info

History

Hymns

Links

Church Office

Prayer

Listening Place

Ministers Page

from the Minister :  Rev. Malcolm Hickox  

 

 

May Newsletter 2008
April Newsletter 2008
March Newsletter 2008
February
Newsletter 2008
December
  Newsletter 2007
November Newsletter 2007
October
Newsletter 2007
September Newsletter 2007
July/August
Newsletter 2007
June
Newsletter 2007

 

from the Minister :  Revd. Malcolm Hickox

 

May 2008

Dear friends,

“I hear you’re going away for three months.”  A comment that’s been made to me by one or two people over recent weeks as news of my forthcoming sabbatical has circulated round the church.  Occasionally, it has sounded as if I am about to go off to the Amazonian Rain Forest for an extended holiday or on a round the world cruise – a nice thought, but not quite the case!  So what’s all this about sabbaticals, what am I planning to do and why?

Sabbaticals have been introduced into many different types of organisations, because they are recognised as a way of re-energising people by allowing them to explore a different aspect of their work or undertake some form of study.  In most organisations they are something for which you apply and seek permission to undertake.  However, several years ago the Methodist Conference decided that sabbaticals should be made compulsory for all presbyters and deacons in their 10th year of ministry and then in every subsequent 7th year.  Although I am in my tenth year of ‘ordained ministry’, I first started working for the Methodist Church in 1974 and apart for three years with the YMCA, the last 34 years of employment have been within Methodism, and this will be my first sabbatical! 

The Methodist Church recognises that a great deal of ministry is about giving, which cannot be sustained indefinitely without also receiving.  Hence, the church’s guidelines for sabbaticals require that ministers take ‘time away from their usual day-to-day job, for further study, reflection, recreation and some renewal.   It may take the form of a retreat, a course, visiting other places and churches, reading, or a combination of these and other things.’   It is also recognises that ‘for a sabbatical to be effective the person taking it must feel that their work is covered and their family are being supported.’  A local sabbatical support group is therefore appointed to oversee all the practical issues and in my case it comprises: David Booth (convenor), Rosemary Dover, Tim Macquiban and Mervyn Liverside, together with Christine and myself.  All the arrangements, including the programme for my three months, have to be approved by the Methodist District, to whom I have to provide a report at the end.

Like writing this letter each month, when faced with choosing how to spend my three months, I started with a blank sheet of paper.  Some exciting and imaginative initial thoughts had to be put into perspective with the constraints of finance and family life, not least with Richard’s ‘A’ levels being this summer.  In the end I chose to focus on an exploration of contemporary worship, which I hope to feed into to the life of SMc over the next few years.  In recent months we have been experimenting with our digital projectors, but we have also been talking about developing new patterns of worship both on Sundays and also on other occasions during the week to complement the more traditional approach.  The ‘Fresh Expressions’ initiative has also encouraged us to experiment and we have already seen the benefits of our MAD (Music, Art & Drama) mornings.  All these require a greater variety of resources and so I am intending to do three things: to catalogue all the existing material I have so as to make it easier to access; to undertake some reading about new developments; and to visit other churches who are experimenting in this way.  I have already been in contact with circuits across our District and I am looking forward to experiencing some of their new patterns of worship rather than just reading about them.

Of course, the other important dimension of my sabbatical is refreshment and the break from meetings, the opportunity to worship rather than just lead worship, and to get a better balance between ‘work and play’.  However, I also intend to undertake a mini pilgrimage following the path of some prominent Christians in the North East of England: Aiden (Holy Island), Bede (Jarrow), Wesley ( Newcastle-upon-Tyne ), Cuthbert ( Durham ) and finishing with Hilda ( Whitby ).  There will be others along the way, but I hope that out of this exploration might come the opportunity for others to join me on a church trip next year.  If you are interested please let me know.   An opportunity has also arisen for me to join a Pilgrimage following in the steps of St Paul and the Book of Revelation, but that will be later in the year.

The Leadership Team have put in place measures to cover my work from mid May to mid August.  Many things will just happen as normal, but for each area there will be someone to contact (full details on the notice boards), below are some key details.  If in doubt please speak to David Booth.

I am very grateful for the opportunity the sabbatical provides, but can I encourage everyone to reflect upon how they sustain their Christian faith and discipleship.  Sometimes we get so involved in ‘doing’ and forget that we need to time to ‘be’.  We need time for reflection, like the Quiet Days at Chalfont; time for prayer, individually or collectively with the Midweek Prayer group; time for personal reading or for discussion in a house group.  In the coming year I hope that we will be offering more help in this area, but why not take your own first steps now. 


Every blessing

Return to Top of Page  

April 2008

Dear Friends

Where there is no vision, the people perish’

[Proverbs 29:18 King James Bible]

It would be interesting to discover where most people look for inspiration or where they turn to for a vision of what might be possible in life.  Whether it is in relation to our personal lives, the life of our church, our community or our country we all need a set of values or principles to guide us and some sort of notion of where we should be heading.  The philosophy of ‘I’m not harming anyone so I can do what I like’ doesn’t hold water when faced with a society that is becoming increasingly fragmented, intolerant, and anti-social within a world where the rich are growing richer and the poor poorer.  To use that well-know expression: ‘to do nothing is to take sides’!

‘The Passion’ on BBC 1 during Holy Week received significant coverage and started some interesting debates.  But for those of us who take our vision, our values, our lead from Jesus, the challenge remains to show how a story 2000 years old still has a relevance today.  In a world short on role models we need to highlight lives which have had a Christ-like pattern to them.  One such person was Martin Luther King, who was assassinated 40 years ago on 4th April 1968, aged 39.  Whilst his most famous speech, ‘I have a dream’ was delivered at a Civil Right rally parts of it still resonate today: 

“... I say to you today, my friends, that in spite of the difficulties and frustrations of the moment I still have a dream.  It is a dream deeply rooted in the American dream.

I have a dream that one day this nation will rise up and live out the true meaning of its creed: ‘We hold these truths to be self-evident; that all men are created equal.’

I have a dream that one day on the red hills of Georgia the sons of former slaves and the sons of former slaveowners will be able to sit down together at the table of brotherhood.

….. I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the colour of their skin but by the content of their character.

….. I have a dream today. I have a dream that one day every valley shall be exalted, every hill and mountain shall be made low, the rough places will be made plains, and the crooked places will be made straight, and the glory of the Lord shall be revealed, and all flesh shall see it together.”

August 28,1963  Washington , D.C

“.... I don't know what will happen now.  We've got some difficult days ahead. But it doesn't matter with me now, because I've been to the mountain top. And I don't mind.  Like anybody, I would like to live a long life; longevity has its place.  But I'm not concerned about that now.  I just want to do God's will. And he's allowed me to go up to the mountain.  And I've looked over.  And I've seen the promised land.  I may not get there with you.  But I want you to know tonight that we as a people will get to the promised land.  And I'm happy tonight, I'm not worried about anything.  I'm not fearing any man.  Mine eyes have seen the glory of the coming of the Lord.”

April 3,1968 Memphis , Tennessee  

Return to Top of Page  

March 2008

Dear friends,

 

Many of us have felt caught out by the speed with which Lent and Easter have come upon us.  I understand that this is as early as Easter can be, but Easter is all about being caught out; about being unprepared; about being taken by surprise and having one’s preconceptions shattered.      

This year our Good Friday service will be slightly earlier at 10.00 a.m. to allow us to participate in an act of witness with Christians from other churches in Salisbury .  Following a short act of worship outside the Guildhall at 11.15 a.m. there will be a silent procession to the Cathedral.  Three large crosses will be carried and the route will take us through the shopping area of the city centre before arriving at the Cathedral for midday , where there will be the opportunity either to join in the Cathedral service or to go home.   

For most people in Salisbury this most holy of days in the Christian calendar will just be another day as they go about their usual activities.  No doubt there will be some who will look on our activities with puzzlement and I suspect that we will overhear people saying, “What are they protesting about?”  The subtle difference between an act of witness and a demonstration is not always obvious and you might well ask what sort of statement we are trying to make.  Are we for something or against something?  Are we promoting a particular cause or simply wanting people to pause and take stock of their lives?  How might the sight of three large crosses touch their lives and indeed, ours?        

On the Sunday after Christmas in our morning worship we remembered the flight of Mary and Joseph with Jesus into Egypt and Herod’s massacre of the children.  ‘A voice is heard in Ramah, lamenting and weeping bitterly: it is Rachel weeping for her children, refusing to be comforted for her children, because they are no more.’ The prophet Jeremiah’s words quoted in Matthew’s gospel and a reminder that Jesus was born into a real world with a message that speaks to the deepest needs of humanity.  And in order to demonstrate that fact, the Church chose as its most sacred symbol a cross, the device by which Jesus was put to death.  It’s an extraordinary idea, but even more baffling to those outside the Christian tradition is the claim that what happened on the cross was a supreme demon­stration of God's power. How can someone dying in agony be a demonstration of God's power?  

One of the ironies of the timing of Easter this year is that Maundy Thursday, 20th March, falls on the 5th anniversary of the start of the war with Iraq .  We are immediately faced with a contrast, which is why various Christian groups are inviting us to mark the eve of this anniversary with another act of witness in London on Wednesday 19th March.  We may see reports on our television screens, but the bare statistics of the last five years speak for themselves:

·        1.2 million Iraqis killed directly and indirectly.  As a result of the destruction of infrastructure tens of thousands experience malnutrition and disease. 

·        A mass exodus of people fleeing from the ongoing violence - 2.2 million displaced internally, more than 2 million fled to neighbouring countries.

·        Tens of thousands of Iraqis detained, many without trial – a major concern highlighted by a UN Human Rights report in June 2007.

·        Targeted attacks on Christian churches and their leaders. The Iraqi Christian community of 800,000 reduced to between 400,000 and 600,000.

·        174 British, 3,923 US, and 133 other military personnel killed in Iraq between March 2003 and 14th January 2008 .

·        According to The Ministry of Defence (MoD) the UK has spent £5 billion on the war in Iraq over and above the UK ’s defence budget. 

    The war in Iraq not only raises questions about the use and abuse of political and military power, it raises questions about how God's power operates in the world.  Much of the Bible is about humanity’s search to discover the rules by which God uses power and then Jesus appears, addressing God as Father.  The implication is that God isn’t some detached remote power, but that God has personality and a presence.  Colin Morris suggests that this divine personality places limits on God’s use of power. Because God is goodness God cannot do evil; because God is love God cannot hate; because God is truth God cannot lie; because God is wisdom God cannot do foolish things.  In other words, God's power is totally shaped by God’s personality.

The Gospel writers attempted to record their understanding of God's power at work through the person of Jesus.  So we have the highly charged entry of Jesus into Jerusalem on Palm Sunday, demonstrating ‘kingship’ on a beast of burden - power shaped by humility.  Then in that upper room on the day before the Passover, John states that Jesus knew that all power in heaven and on earth had been given to him.  So how does he demonstrate that power?  He takes a towel and washes his disciples' feet - power shaped by love and care for others in the menial tasks.  By contrast our society appears to be obsessed with power, seemingly craving the power God possesses, but without having the personality of God demonstrated in the life of Jesus.  

There are plenty of examples of power which seeks to dominate and coerce.  The image of God in Jesus, reigning from the cross is not only absurd it scandalises God by its sense of impotence and yet the highest exercise of power is a willingness to refrain from using it.  God doesn’t use power to dominate or suppress or ruthlessly control us, God uses power to change the human heart without smashing the human will.  In the words of Colin Morris, God's love is capable of bending proud human wills that iron bars could not break, and so make human beings fit to handle power.  Which is why the cross symbolises God’s power to save humanity. 

Every blessing to you this Eastertide

Return to Top of Page  

February 2008

Dear friends,

 The early Christians were known as people of ‘The Way’, which suggests that they were not simply a sect within Judaism who had a different set of beliefs they were a group of people who followed a particular way of life.  The image of the Church as ‘The Pilgrim People’ is a picture which I have written about previously in the Newsletter and is one which not only has a strong affinity with the idea of Christians being people of ‘The Way’ but was at the centre of our church life when SMc was refurbished in 1992.  At a very practical level this meant that the Sanctuary was designed to have flexible seating which could be moved into different arrangements appropriate for the worship and to signify that we are not a static people.  The furniture was also made so that no item takes more than two people to move.  

The idea of movement and faith, or journeys and pilgrimage is not just a New Testament image for God’s people it is deeply rooted in the Hebrew Scriptures.  Time and again the writers return to the Exodus as being the example of God’s saving acts and the forty year journey through the wilderness as being the experience which formed them into a nation, a people of the Covenant.  It was in journeying together that they discovered the true nature of God and what it meant to be God’s people.  And you could say that it was when they became static, when they became settled and comfortable, that they forgot about God and their relationship with God went wrong.  

At the beginning of January in our Covenant Service we committed ourselves to a particular type of Journey with God.  It was not so much a recognition of God’s claim upon our lives as of us choosing to offer the whole of our lives to God.  The journey is understood in terms of us travelling with God into a pattern of discipleship where we allow God to lead us into the places, the actions and the communities where we can be of most service to God.  

As we approach Lent we are reminded of another journey of faith, that of Jesus in the wilderness.  The Gospels portray it as a time of testing, of reflection and commitment; a time of preparation for the journey from Galilee towards Jerusalem and the cross.  As we move through Lent we recall the cost of that journey and celebrate Jesus’ love for God and for humanity which the events of Holy Week demonstrate.  It may be a familiar story, but it still has the power to take hold of us and move the inner most part of our lives.  

George MacLeod, Founder of the lona Community, summed it up by saying:

The Bible is the most profound dramatisation of you ... The historic story of Christ, the outside story of Christ, suddenly emerges as the inner story of yourself - and it's this inner story, this inner parallel, that really makes the Bible inspired, so that to your condition it becomes the living Word of God.’ 

In the forward to the Iona book of Lent and Easter readings, Kathy Galloway suggests that there is always the temptation to read these words and, indeed, to read the Bible, as being about the dramatisation of me, and Christ's story as the inner story of myself.  She goes on to say that it is precisely because we can discern in the scriptures our own personal experiences of loss and love and betrayal, of suffering and hope, mediated to us through the experiences of other people in other times and places, that their stories, and above all the Christ story, have such power to comfort and encourage, to chasten and challenge and inspire us. 

But, as Kathy Galloway points out, there is a danger that if we restrict ourselves to a simple personal or individual reading of the story we run the risk of missing the point completely.  Most of us have moments when we feel that 'no one suffers quite like me', whereas we are actually more like everybody else than we often care to admit.  And the story is actually a dramatisation of us, not just me - the inner story of ourselves.  In other words, in the story of Jesus we find humankind in all its diversity and similarity; and the way of the cross takes many forms as we witness in the relentless parade of human misery that we see on our nightly news.  Sadly, the experience of loss and love and betrayal, of suffering and hope, is universal.

The wilderness experience of the Hebrew People was a community experience into which God revealed his message through the Ten Commandments and the leadership of Moses and others.  Our journey through Lent, Holy Week and into Easter is shaped by the story of Jesus, but it is also undertaken in a real world and in solidarity with the corporate experience of humanity.  Kathy Galloway again suggests that through prayer, reading, meditation and solitude, we may withdraw and reflect on the wilderness places in our hearts and lives.  We may remember and name our own temp­tations and frailties and hear again the call to conversion, to turn as the prodigal son did and head for home.  But we also need the company of others to root us firmly in our humanity, so that we might discover that it is only in the sharing of our human vulnerability and frailty that our potential for resurrection is to be found.

We are offering a variety of opportunities for study and reflection during Lent which will reflect on The Lord’s Prayer.  It is no coincidence that we start that prayer with ‘Our Father’ rather than ‘My Father’.  If we are to live out the promises that we undertook in the Covenant Service we will need to find the strength to journey forward with God.  Let me encourage you all to set aside some time for reflection and study this Lent.

Every blessing

Return to Top of Page  

December 2007

Dear friends,

Back in the 1960s, New Christian, a radical Christian journal, celebrated its first anniversary with an editorial saying that the time had come for angels to go: ‘Their removal from the pulpits, the Sunday School lessons and the liturgies, would surely be a real gain.'  Not unexpectedly, it provoked more correspondence than any other article.  I guess if we are honest, there's a large part of us which gets confused when we start talking about angels and as Bishop John Robinson suggested at the time, ‘For most ordinary people angels merely add to the cocoon of fantasy and unreality in which the Christian gospel is wrapped.  So far from making the Faith more real, they undoubtedly make it more unreal, remote and airborne.’   You might add that with the pantomime season about to start there is always the potential for an angel to be confused with the fairy who appears to offer protection or the genie who grants wishes! 

Charles Wesley (whose tercentenary we shall be celebrating on 18th December) penned the lines: ‘Hark! The herald-angels sing glory to the new-born king’ and ‘Let earth and heaven combine, angels and men agree’, which we will no doubt sing over Christmas.  This year’s Christmas stamps also feature angels and the Salisbury Churches Together Nativity Scene for the Market Square has a huge angel. So what should we be trying to communicate about angels and is it worth travelling this difficult path?    In his book, ‘But that I can’t believe’ John Robinson suggests that it is important to interpret what belief in angels is really about, but only in a way that adds to, rather than detracts from, the reality and richness of life.  In doing so he looks back to the Middle Ages when everyone believed in angels, taking them literally, and theologians debated obscure points about ‘Angelology’.  With the Renaissance, angels became domesticated, appearing in paintings as cherubs - sweet little boys with wings and blissful smiles.  Then, with the Romantic Movement, they became sentimenta­lized as the sexless creatures who float through pre-Raphaelite paintings and stained-glass windows.  Perhaps it’s no wonder, as Robinson suggests, that by this time they had become so thoroughly vapid and meaningless that it's hardly surprising that most people have now dismissed them altogether. 

Even in our scientific age we can’t deny what might be around the universe, but the Christian faith doesn’t call us to put our belief in unidentified flying objects.  Neither does believing in angels, any more than believing in Adam and Eve, require us to accept the existence of actual beings who are or were around the world as we are.  In the Bible’s picture language angels, like Adam and Eve, are ways of representing certain convictions - theological not scientific - about the meaning of life.  Robinson suggests that they stand for the belief that there's always a spiritual as well as a material aspect to life and that the entire universe is shot through with God and God’s living activity.

As Middle Eastern literature, the Bible frequently uses these ‘word pictures’, and angels are portrayed as a sort of communication system between God (in heaven) and humans (on earth).  Hence, the Greek word for angel, angellos, means a messenger and to get about they are imagined as having wings.  But when angels appear to men and women on earth there is nothing to suggest that they look different from ordinary people.  In fact more often than not they are portrayed as ordinary people, either real or in dreams, who are seen at the time or subsequently as having something to say from God.  That’s what happened to Abraham when he met three men and, according the Epistle to the Hebrews, ‘entertained angels unaware’.  In the Bible, if God was seen to be in an event, then the human agents or interpreters of it were identified as angels.  So an angel isn’t about a type of being so much as an action.  Which is why we use the phrase ‘be an angel’ not to tell someone to ‘go and get themselves wings', but to 'do something angelic'.  

John the Baptist, didn't have wings, but he was a man sent from God and in that sense an angel.  And the Apostle Paul applies the term to Christian ministry.  In the Bible it’s often the case that angels come in and out of everyday events entirely naturally, which is one way of conveying the conviction that God is constantly present in ordinary life.  One interpretation of Matthew’s nativity story of an angel appearing to Joseph in a dream to warn him of Herod is simply that Joseph had a dream in which he was told to get out quickly, and that in this he saw 'the hand of God'.  The way the Bible registers these incidents suggests that they weren't just accidents or coincidences and to talk of angels is similar to how we talk of providence.   In other words angels suggest God being at work wonderfully, graciously.

Peter Rush, the artist who has created the new Nativity Scene, has said that he doesn’t believe in angels, but through his sculpture he is trying to convey God’s presence over Mary, Joseph and Jesus.  What about us?  Well, I guess all too often we take bible stories at face value and life becomes very pedestrian. We treat the Bible as English literature and rationalise everything, forgetting that like the hymns of Charles Wesley, it contains poetry designed to evoke deep mystery, wonder and the incredible truth of God’s commitment to us.  So as you sing the carols this Christmas and hear again stories from Scripture allow your mind to be stretched and lifted to another level.  And if you stand under the nativity scene in the Market Square why not enter into conversation with others around you about what it says about God and the birth of Jesus!      


Every blessing,

Return to Top of Page  

November 2007

Dear friends,

 

Catch a Perry Como wash him out in Omo hang him on the line to dry,

If he gets starchy call him Liberace, Omo is the best to buy.

A little ditty we used to sing when I was young to the tune of the song ‘Catch a falling star’.  If you’re too young and don’t know what I’m talking about then I’m sorry, but maybe you remember the advert which said: ‘A Mars a day helps you work, rest and play.’  It eventually had to be withdrawn because there was no way of scientifically proving the advert’s claim!  I can also remember a poster outside our church in Croydon from forty years ago which carried the slogan: ‘A Double Diamond works blunders’.  It was issued by the Christian Citizenship Department of the Methodist Church in response to the 1968 brewery advert accompanied by the song: A Double Diamond works wonders, works wonders, works wonders, a Double Diamond works wonders, so drink one today! set to the tune ‘There's a hole in my bucket’  

It’s not always easy to account for what stays in one’s memory and why you remember some things and not others - that was always my excuse when faced with school examinations!  There are things we have absorbed through our upbringing or through different experiences that have become deeply ingrained within us, so much so that they shape our attitudes and our beliefs.  The way the Methodist Church discusses the use of alcohol has certainly changed in the last forty years and most churches would think twice before using the sort of poster I referred to above.  But often ‘the world at large’ still views Methodists as ‘those people who don’t drink, don’t gamble, don’t do this and don’t do that’!  I’m not suggesting that we should not take a stand on what we believe to be right, far from it, but I do worry when people describe us by what we don’t do rather than by the positive things we seek to do.  Image and ‘spin’ and style have come to have negative connotations in the political arena and the plea is for more substance and policies.  From the perspective of the Church we might ask how in a modern sceptical world we can present what we believe in such a way as to encourage conversation and debate rather than being dismissed as irrelevant.  

When Greg Dyke became Director General of the BBC in 2000 he was confronted by the image of Lord Reith, not just his portrait in the Council Chamber, but his legacy and philosophy which still shaped much of the corporation’s activities.  The fascination with his illustrious predecessor eventually led Greg Dyke to present a television programme on Reith’s life, which was broadcast on BBC 4 in April this year.  It was as result of this programme that we invited Greg Dyke to come and speak to us at SMc.  Reith hated the idea of television, but eventually allowed its development.  One could guess what he might say about the current developments and highly competitive market place in which numerous channels compete with each other.  His vision of the BBC existing to ‘educate, inform, entertain’ is still part of the corporation’s current mission statement, but what does it mean today?  

The BBC’s Royal Charter has just been renewed for another ten years, but in recent days the current Director General, Mark Thompson, has announced a programme of massive changes in order to balance the corporation’s budget.  At the same time major questions have been asked about the activities of the BBC and ITV, with accusations about the ‘dumbing down’ of programmes, the bias of some news and current affairs reporting, and the place of religious broadcasting.  We have also seen revelations about the manipulations of phone-in competitions and surveys indicating that ITV is making far fewer children’s programmes and substituting some rather dubious cartoon series.  Most of us were brought up to implicitly trust the integrity, authority and accuracy of the BBC, but is that still the case and what do we expect from our broadcasters? 

Sir Michael Checkland, another former BBC Director General, explored some of these issues when he was Vice President of the Methodist Conference in 1997.  But in ten years much has changed and some of the key questions today centre on the future of Public Service Broadcasting, which is why we have asked Greg Dyke to speak on this important topic.  In May 2005 he became chairman of HIT, a production company specializing in programmes for the under fives and with over 30 years in broadcasting he is well placed to contribute to the current debate.  Rev Dr Andrew Wood, Chair of our Methodist District, will be joining us for the evening and will be steering through the second half of the programme, which will be an open conversation with Greg.  I am delighted that Greg and Andrew are willing to fit this engagement into their busy schedules and warmly commend the evening to you (details elsewhere).  I am also grateful to Greg for declining to accept any fee or expenses, enabling the proceeds from the evening to be given to charities selected by the Church Council.      

As with the old Mars Bar adverts, Christians make great claims, in our case about the gospel, which cannot be proved scientifically.  Like broadcasters today, we have a major concern for how we communicate, how we can be trusted and seen to be speaking with authority.  What Greg Dyke has to say about broadcasting might also help us to reflect on the nature of the Church in a time of great change. 

Every blessing,

 Return to Top of Page  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 October 2007

Dear friends,  

It’s Friday, it’s five o’clock and it’s ….. CRACKERJACK!  Words still with me from my childhood television days.  Then reality hits - it’s Monday, it’s nine o’clock (a.m.) and ……. this page is still blank! (The Newsletter editors have yet to remind me that I have missed the deadline.)  Writing a daily or weekly column in a newspaper must be a demanding occupation, but writing a monthly newsletter article is also challenging.  It’s not that there is nothing to say, there are too many issues and situations on which to comment!  

Earlier in the year the Methodist Recorder contained a good deal of correspondence about ‘the state of worship today’.  One church member wrote, ‘While social justice and environmental matters are important, very important, and do indeed relate to the outworking of our faith, faith and worship are surely about much more than that.’  He went on to say that he had become weary of harvest festival services where the central theme is on fair trade issues.  And whilst acknowledging that he would be concerned if we ignored these issues he concluded by saying that his concern was that we don’t hear more about spiritual growth and renewal within our churches.

Having just conducted our harvest festival service I could reflect on what I was trying to achieve by the mixed content of our worship.  As I have indicated before, harvest festivals are notoriously difficult to lead in a ‘town context’ where the visual impact of harvesting is not apparent.  In fact, two folk joined us for our service because their local church no longer has a harvest festival service.  It might also be interesting to reflect that at the same time as we were holding our service the Salisbury Food & Drink Festival was taking place round the corner in the Market Square .  Maybe we should have hired a tent and held our service in the Square?  

The prophet Amos was deeply concerned about the spiritual growth and renewal of his people and he berated them because they continued to worship God with offerings and sacrifices, but failed to acknowledge the centrality of God to the whole of life.  They were impervious to the plight of the poor and actively sustained a system which increased their suffering.  To translate his message into modern language, Amos reminded his people that their worship, their life styles, their politics and social responsibility all belonged together.  In other words, the way they lived their lives displayed the content of their hearts much more than their supposed worship of God.  

Our Methodist Recorder correspondent has a point about balance in worship, but what about Amos?  Our spirituality is shaped just as much by the events and encounters of life as by our worship on a Sunday.  At the same time renewal in the church is not just about an individual’s relationship with God, 

it’s about their pattern of discipleship.  The God whom Amos describes as ‘the one who made the mountains and created the winds. …. makes his thoughts known to people; changes day into night …. walks on the heights of the earth’ ( 4:13 ) is not only ‘The Lord God Almighty’ this is the one who chooses to reveal himself in the everyday experiences of living.  This is the God we marvel at as we take in the shear breadth and beauty of the created universe.  This is the God we wrestle with as we struggle with the complexities of Christian living.  This is the God we shout at as the pain and suffering of life bears down upon us.  And all these experiences and contradictions we bring with us into our worship as we seek to make sense of God, to understand what it means to be human and how we might live in community with each other and in partnership with God.  In this way worship is a redeeming and renewing experience, at the end of which we are sent out into the world to be God’s salt and light, to be the yeast of the kingdom.  

Of course, we might be tempted to say, ‘It’s Sunday, it’s 10.30, it’s worship!  Which is, of course, true in the congregational sense, but Amos reminded his people that the whole of life is ‘worship’ – giving worth to God.  That’s the challenge for us individually as we face up to issues like caring for the environment, trade justice, poverty and suffering.  And the challenge for us collectively, is to find new patterns of worship which will reach out to those outside our normal sphere of influence.  If we are to commend God’s love and grace to them and offer worship as an opportunity for spiritual growth and renewal we will need to meet in other ways and on other occasions.  It’s for this reason that we are holding a Worship Consultation to explore new initiatives and we would welcome contributions from anyone.

 

Every blessing, 

Return to Top of Page  

 September 2007

Dear friends,

How should we sing?  

In the last two newsletter I have written about ‘Why do we sing?’ and ‘What should we sing?’ so the logical third instalment in this trilogy is ‘How do we sing?’  This might appear to be a strange question to some as clearly to sing we have to open our mouths and allow a sound to emerge.  Equally, it might appear to be a rather technical question to those who have been trained to sing in a choir or as a soloist.  It is not my intention to comment on the technical issues, but there are some spiritual aspects of hymn singing that we might explore and also questions to do with our attitudes.  

Several years ago I was in a small congregation one Sunday afternoon when we were asked to sing Hymns & Psalms 640, Father, in high heaven dwelling.  All was well until the second verse when the enthusiastic and lusty singing had the effect of reducing me to a fit of the giggles!  The reason being the words: ‘This day’s sins, O pardon, Saviour – evil thoughts, perverse behaviour ……’ The thought flashed through my mind about what sort of perverse behaviour these elderly folk might have been up to that day since they appeared so enthusiastic about the opportunity for forgiveness!  

We sometimes say “we sang well this morning” or “we had a good sing today”, but what are we actually saying?  How do we judge if we have sung well, is it by the quality of the choral performance?  And is ‘a good sing’ an experience which uplifts, challenges, moves you in some way?  I have written that music has the ability to touch deep emotions, but what I want to suggest is that there are appropriate and inappropriate ways to sing.       

We can forget that until about 1700 Anglicans and nonconformists sang almost nothing but metrical psalms.  Then Watts, Wesley and others began writing hymns which, because they were not versions of Scripture, gave room for greater freedom of expression and Watts recommended a faster more robust style of singing.  This was not only daring, it was mildly subversive, because strictly speaking it was illegal!  The early Methodists soon began to write new tunes in an unashamed secular style which would not have been out of place in the theatre, the pleasure gardens, or even the tavern.  Many of the new hymns expressed personal religious thoughts and feelings in vigorous, emotional language and the tunes were remarkable for their variety, vitality and originality, some of which were close to folk tunes.  Within Methodism a variety of practices developed with hymns being spoken as well as being sung unaccompanied.  Gradually gallery bands of bass violin, bassoon, clarinet, violin and flute became common, until the introduction of organs from the 1830's onwards.  The Victorian developments undoubtedly took away some of the spontaneity and introduced more sombre tunes.    

The historical background reminds us that our hymns come to us from particular situations and the danger is that we can easily go onto ‘automatic pilot’ when we sing, particularly with tunes we enjoy.  We get so caught up in the music that we forget the words and why they might have been written.  Some hymns from the Sheffield writers, like James Montgomery, were the equivalent of modern protest songs, commenting on social conditions from a gospel perspective.  Some like Wesley’s ‘And can it be’ start as a question, but due to our tune and the way we sing we loose that perspective.  Perhaps we need to be more aware of how we express the meaning of the words by the way we sing: soft or loud, affirming or questioning, fast or slow, and even by the expression on our faces and our ‘body language’.  

Maybe John Wesley should have the last word with his directions for Congregational Singing contained in his ‘Select Hymns’ of 1761:

1.      Learn these Tunes before any others; afterwards learn as many as you please.

2.           Sing them exactly as printed here, without altering or mending them, and if you have learned them otherwise, unlearn them as soon as you can.

3.           Sing all.  See that you join with the congregation as frequently as you can.  Let not a slight degree of weakness or weariness hinder you.  If it is a cross to you, take it up and you will find it a blessing.

4.           Sing lustily and with good courage.  Beware of singing as if you were half dead or half asleep, but lift up your voice with strength.  Be no more afraid of your voice now, nor more ashamed of its being heard, than when you sang the songs of Satan.

5.           Sing modestly.  Do not bawl, so as to be heard above or distinct from the rest of the congregation, that you may not destroy the harmony: but strive to mate your voices together so as to make one clear melodious sound.

6.           Sing in time.  Whatever time is sung, be sure to keep with it.  Do not run before it or stay behind it; but attend close to the leading voices and move therewith exactly as you can, and take care not to sing too slow.  This drawling way naturally steals on all who are lazy and it is high time to drive it out from us, and sing all our tunes just as quick as we did at first.

7.           Above all, sing spiritually.  Have an eye to God in every word you sing.  Aim at pleasing him more than yourself or any other creature.  In order to do this attend strictly to the sense of what you sing, and see that your heart is not carried away with the sound, but offered to God continually; so shall your singing be such as the Lord will approve here, and reward you when he cometh in the clouds of heaven.

 

Every blessing,

Return to Top of Page  

 

 

July/August 2007

Dear friends,

What should we sing?  

Last month I wrote about ‘Why do we sing?’ and having identified, with John Bell’s assistance, eleven reasons it now seems appropriate to reflect upon what we should sing.  Ask that question in a mixed group in any church and you will almost certainly get widely differing views, with some folk even falling out over the issue!  Most of us take our singing seriously and will have our favourite hymns/songs and preferred styles, which means that a leader of worship will always have a tough job pleasing everyone.  Sometimes I spend almost as much time selecting what to sing in a service as on the sermon!  

Judging by the preface to his 1780 Collection of Hymns for use of the People called Methodist, John Wesley encountered similar problems.  He was accused of producing hymn books that were too cumbersome and expensive, but when he published an extract, it was deemed too small!  Hence, he said of his 1780 publication: ‘It is not so large as to be either cumbersome, or expensive: and it is large enough to contain such a variety of hymns as will not soon be worn threadbare.  It is large enough to contain all the important truths of our most holy religion, whether speculative or practical; yea, to illustrate them all, and to prove them both by Scripture and reason.’   He went on to say of the hymns: ‘In these there is no doggerel; no botches; nothing put to patch up the rhyme; no feeble expletives.  Here is nothing turgid or bombast, on the one hand, or low and creeping on the other.  Here are no cant expressions, no words without meaning.’  

The editors of Hymns & Psalms (1983) recognised that since the publication of the Methodist Hymn Book (1933) the world had changed into a global village with instantaneous communication links, but at the same time with the development of nuclear weapons and the possibility of mass destruction, genetic engineering and germ warfare, it had become a more frightening place.  Hence, they had attempted to produce a hymn book which articulated the needs, the joys, and the fears of the contemporary world.  

Clearly, language has changed dramatically since Wesley’s day, which raises questions about the use of some older hymns if their meaning has become obscure.  However, there are many today who would argue that as a nation we have become lazy and casual about the use of the English language in our everyday speech and writing.  At the same time, since the publication of Hymns & Psalms church life has moved on and our musical tastes have equally changed.  But none of these changes take away the principle that in our worship of God we offer the best that we have.  Hence, all our songs and hymns, whether old or new, should reflect something of quality in their language and construction.  Equally, they should reflect what we believe and be appropriate to the context in which we live.

If quality of language and ‘sound theology’ are starting points for the selection of hymns and songs for a service, then what other factors should we take into consideration?  The Warden of the former Lincoln Theological College once said that in the Anglican tradition hymns were a bit like punctuation marks in the liturgy (that’s why organists often select them), whereas in the Methodist tradition the hymns are the liturgy.  Well, both traditions are changing, but the following summarises some of the guidance offered to Local Preachers in training about choosing what to sing:

·     Appropriateness to the season – is it right for the particular time in the Christian year, time of day, season, weather etc.?

·     Appropriateness to the readings – do at least some of the songs/hymns link to the theme being explored?

·     Place in the service – do they fit into the overall shape of the service with praise and adoration at the start, dedication and commitment towards the end and a ‘sending out’ hymn/song to conclude.

·     The hymn as a whole – the first lines and verse are often the most familiar parts, but is the rest of the hymn still appropriate?

·     Appropriateness to the congregation – is it right for the age range, their background and experience and the type of service planned?

·     Familiarity and appropriate music – is it known to the congregation or is the tune known, will there be enough people in the congregation to sing it, is the music within the capabilities of the musician(s) and what are the most appropriate instruments for the accompaniment?

·     Variety of metre, length and mood – is there a sufficient mixture in the selection of hymns/songs or are they all the same style?

·     Ancient and modern – does the mix speak of a faith which has stood the test of time, but is still vibrant and relevant to the congregation today?

·     Corporate hymns – worship is a corporate activity, are there sufficient hymns/songs which refer to ‘we’, ‘our’ and ‘us’ as well the many which have ‘I’, ‘my’ and ‘me’, suitable for personal reflection and commitment?  

There are, no doubt, other criteria which could be used for selecting what to sing, but our Music Consultation thought that it would be good to open up the issue in the Newsletter.  Our next meeting is on Monday 16th July and anyone with an interest in music is welcome to attend.  Let me also commend the Singing Fellowship as a way to explore a wide range of modern songs and encourage any instrumentalists who would like to offer their talents to speak to Brian Mould, Ruth & David Booth or myself.

Every blessing   Signed Malcolm

Return to Top of Page  

June 2007

 Dear friends,

Why do we sing?  

As part of our celebration of the 300th Anniversary of the birth of Charles Wesley we had a special Songs of Praise on Sunday 20th May.  If you missed it, well, we had a great time!  My colleague, the Principal of Sarum College, Revd Dr Tim Macquiban, (also Vice President of the Charles Wesley Society) took on the role of the great hymn writer for the night as he and others acted out various scenes from his life and we sang some memorable Wesley hymns.  It didn’t surprise me to hear numerous comments about the quality of the singing that night and, of course, it is often said that Methodism was born in song.  But in today’s society we were engaging in a rather unusual activity, not just because it was hymns that we were singing, but because we have very largely lost the art of communal singing.  

The previous day I had been taken aback by the rather incongruous sight of ‘Abide with me’ being sung at the FA Cup Final.  I was hoping that the line ‘change and decay in all around I see’ wasn’t a comment on the new multi-million pound Wembly Stadium.  As it turned out, the decay part was a rather more prophetic word on the quality of football that followed!  But if we question why ‘Abide with me’ is still sung at the Cup Final, other than it’s always been so, then maybe we need to face that other question, ‘Why do we still sing in church?’  

In his book, ‘The Singing Thing’ (Wild Goose Publications, 2000), John Bell offers eleven reasons for congregational singing in worship.  Without commenting on what we sing (that might be the subject of another article) I thought it would be interesting to reflect on John’s arguments, which I have summarised.  So why do we sing?     

Because we can – it’s a natural activity peculiarly suited to humans.

To create identity – we cannot all speak together, but we can all sing together and so we sing and select music to express our group identity.

To express emotion – whether it’s in the acclamations of joy or the expressions of remorse, anger and sorrow, singing enables us to embrace and express all our emotions across the human and spiritual spectrum.

To express words – given the right match, music can help to articulate words and flesh out their meaning.

To revisit the past – songs, like smell are highly evocative and they can root us in the past, which can give strength in times of vulnerability.

To tell stories – songs help to shape our faith by re-telling the story of God’s dealings with humanity, especially in Christ.

To shape the future – the most memorable line of a sermon may be forgotten, but singing is a hearing, seeing and doing activity, which therefore shapes our beliefs, because we absorb and remember much more of the truths contained in what we sing.  

To enable work – we may not often sing as we work, but the term ‘liturgy’ is derived from two Greek words which mean the work of the people, and so singing has an important place in our worship liturgy, because it illuminates the reason for gathering together and affirms our commitment as God’s people to the purposes of our maker.

To exercise our creativity – all who are made in the image of God are creative and the moment we open our mouths to sing we are putting our own interpretation on what the words and music mean, hence singing is a creative process.

To give of ourselves – when we sing we do something unique, because there is no voice which sounds like ours and our unique contribution is our gift to God.

To obey a command – at least six psalms contain the phrase ‘Sing a new song’ and there are many echoes of that sentiment in other parts of the Hebrew Scriptures.  We sing to celebrate God’s magnificence, generosity and imagination, but we particularly sing new songs as a sign that our love of God is lively and not tired.  

It might be interesting to have a series in our Newsletter about hymns and songs which members of the congregation find particularly helpful or meaningful.  Whilst not written as a hymn for Pentecost, I find Charles Wesley’s ‘O thou who camest from above’ (H&P 745) personalises the impact that the coming of the Spirit can have on an individual’s life.  The first and third verses are particularly challenging:  

O thou who camest from above

The pure celestial fire to impart,

Kindle a flame of sacred love

On the mean altar of my heart!

 

Jesus, confirm my heart's desire

To work, and speak, and think for thee;

Still let me guard the holy fire,

And still stir up thy gift in me –